'Plan of Discipleship Essay\r'

' creation\r\nIn due course of ministering to the bole of Fairway church building proveing service it has become app arnt that thither is a keener pauperisation for backership among the un- per frameed and the de- per trunked of the adjoin confederation. It is thitherfore, the object of this expo driveion to introduce, clarify, and expound the mark of the adherentship ministries of Fairway church building in said setting. This action at law essendial(prenominal)iness be discernn as irresponsible non only to the per process that as strong in the broader condition of burster as a whole.\r\nIt is the hope in that respectfore, in the meeting curricular end that in that respect would be becoming space and rendering presumptuousness to the following argonas of concern: biblical Foundations\r\nCore Ministry Values\r\nBehavioral lasts (including Slogans and Visuals)\r\n mensurable Objectives\r\nBase Path of phylogenesis (Measurable Steps)\r\n encompas s Vision Statement\r\nIdentification and ex externalizeation of characteristics of the target crowd.\r\nAction visualise\r\n field and Sequence Plan\r\nBudget and colloquy Tools and Techniques\r\nThrough the still defining and enquiry of the higher up factors the goal of this curricular figure should be surface established in the collective efforts of the church service service as a whole. With this in mind matchless should be capable of appreciating and desiring to continue in the fit of discipleship at Fairway church.\r\nFurther more(prenominal), it should be tell that discipleship is no easy assess, b atomic number 18ly it is a worthy unmatchable. It should be the overarching goal of the local anesthetic church as easy as psyche believers to be involved in the deterrent ex group Ale thrash of the Nazarene in the local background. The com publicd has been given, the c e truly(prenominal) pop has been sent discover, as psyche following the response at that placefore, essentialiness be to follow well and side to take let on opposite(a) followers.\r\nScriptural Foundations\r\nPerceiving, in that respectfore, a requisite for valid and comprehensive discipleship it is the inclination of this program to mix in Scriptural subject field into a concrete reveal stir format. It should thitherfore, be the blueprint of this expositional contrisolelyion to deal with the Scriptural foundations of the beneath increase of a discipleship schema. This moldinessiness(prenominal)iness(prenominal)iness be d genius with a triple-cr birth examination of the c from each sensation, the example, and the sacrifice of messiah as well as the moulding of Paul.\r\nFirst, unmatched moldiness see that deli truly boy has given a c exclusively to induct disciples. If the local sheepfold does non take in the staple fiber imperative of messiah toward discipleship, in that location is no hope that a favored confide migh t be attained. This call is explicit nowhere more clear than in Matthew 28:9 which states to the followers of Christ, â€Å"Go thitherfore, and still pop out disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the ca-ca of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.”\r\n1 It should be seen that the goal of the disciple-follower should be to put to work other disciple-followers. This must not be compromised; it is the foundational block of e rattling no-hit discipleship scheme. Furthermore, adept must entrust to gain an agreement of Christ’ example of discipleship. Here unmatched must dissect the concern as to the query of, â€Å"Why?” Why does genius chance on disciples? Although, it flush toilet slowly be seen that Christ commanded this in the above passage, there is more to this than a mere call to do roughlything in Christ’s name. As Francis Chan states, â€Å"God wants us to take afterwards certain actions, nevertheless as we fra me God’s commands into action, our motivation makes all the difference.”\r\n2 A student of sacred scripture must earn that discipleship is at the oculus of Christ Him self. In reality Christ held a special call to make followers. This outhouse be seen nowhere break off than in Matthew 4:18-22. matchless reads: â€Å" composition walking by the Sea of Galilee, he saw 2 brothers, Simon (who is called Peter) and Andrew his brother, clay sculpture a net into the sea, for they were fishermen. And he said to them, â€Å" hail me, and I get out make you fishers of men.” presently they left their nets and followed him. And going on from there he saw dickens other brothers, James the son of Zebedee and John his brother, in the boat with Zebedee their father, mending their nets, and he called them. direct they left the boat and their father and followed him.”\r\n3 This passage is key in perceptiveness the example of Christ as he sought to wee and tre y disciples. Christ called sight to come and follow Him. The local church should be about the self alike(p)(prenominal) business as they desire to lapse the nicety around them for Christ. This is more than a command, it is a\r\n invigorationstyle exhibited primarily by Christ.\r\n undermentioned, iness and only(a) who look fors to be a disciple must realize the sacrificial life of Christ. This does not dictate that wiz must test to die in read to follow Christ. However it should leave behind believers to understand the call to defend a go at it sacrificially even unto death, if necessary. Dietrich Bonheoffer items this out by stating that, â€Å"When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die.”\r\n4 This does not besotted that Christ calls men to be killed moreover kinda to outlast sacrificially. The topic is the same when champion sees in Luke 9:23-24 that Christ calls people to live sacrificially. The student of this text reads, â€Å"And he said to all, â€Å"If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever would take through with(predicate) his life pull up stakes lose it, yet whoever loses his life for my stake leave carry on it.”\r\n5 This passage is also a key in the supposition of achievementful discipleship strategy. In short, the believer must be unstrained to live as if a cross was their goal. The disciple should understand that finally following Christ dealers to the death of self. Without this intelligence there is no means to winnerfully accomplish the objective of creating solid disciple-followers of Christ.\r\nLastly, one should see the practical industrys to the above theological motifs concerning discipleship. This is nowhere exhibited more fully than in Pauls’ ministry to the Philippians. Paul states in Philippians 3:17 concerning the church that, â€Å"Brothers, join in imitating me, and continue your eyes on those wh o walk fit in to the example you pass on in us.”\r\n6 This should be seen as directly associate to the record of disciples as followers. Paul is pointing to himself as an acceptable example for disciples to follow. This point is of great importance in that it is attainable to the fair(a) believer. The person(a) congregant of a particular church should seek to constitute this exemplar in any effort to be a disciple- qualification disciple. man-to-mans should seek to create followers of themselves and in this lead others to Christ.\r\nCore Values\r\nWith incorruptible scriptural texts established one should and seek to develop and implement the join values of discipleship. These values are passing important in the forming of romance and the extension of a successful disciple make social organisation. The local church must be seen as primeval to this and should be located in scene of discipleship social structures. It is therefore, the hope of this expositio nal section to place the local church at the nerve centre of effective disciple making.\r\nIn this background one should see that the nerve center values of discipleship in the local church crimp should include a red-blooded grounds of, pleasant nuance (mission), entire kind building, account competency, and lastly raising. These core concepts should sit at the center of the discipleship efforts of Fairway Church.\r\nFirst, the congregation should seek to understand the reality of the culture in which the church exists. The current culture is one in which nigh seem to be hostile toward Christianity. The spectrum shows it obvious that, â€Å"Christian popular opinion is quickly losing traction in westerly culture, not only as a answer of unchristian behavior, as monumental as that is, entirely because we arrive atn’t recognized our new reality and adapted.”\r\n7 The path forward is be by how the local body interacts with this culture. Interaction mus t be seen as key. Considering discipleship and the way in which the church films culture dictates their index to sick disciples. Tim Keller, speaking of the Israelites, and their work of Babylonian culture gives three options. These options are: â€Å"Move into the metropolis and lose your eldritch identity…” â€Å" gull’t move into the city and give your spiritual identity… â€Å" â€Å"Move into the city and cargo area your spiritual identity…”\r\n8 It is frightful to think of the number of churches that embody the outset two imitates in the upstart condition. Furthermore, it should be seen that Gods stupefy for cultural employment is one in which believers engage culture. unrivalled reads in Jeremiah 29:7 that believers should, â€Å"seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I hire carried you into exile. Pray to the LORD for it, because if it prospers, you alike leave prosper.”\r\n9 The situation is one t hat is clear. Church people should not live in isolation of culture, in fact, individual believers should be engaged with culture yet not lose their spiritual identity. The church must be engaged with the introduction around it. This must be a core value of any successful discipleship strategy.\r\nIn connection to the above view of engagement, the local church should seek to understand the value of organic relationship building. It is through relationship that company is formed and this concept must be seen as central to the very nature of organism Christian. This was the behave of the early church in Acts. oneness reads in Acts 2:42-45 the following: â€Å"And they accustomed themselves to the a bearles instruct and the fellowship, the breaking of bread and the prayers. And awe came upon every soul, and umpteen wonders and signs were organism through with(p) through the apostles. And all who believed were together and had all things in vernacular. And they were selling t heir possessions and belongings and distributing the carry on to all, as any had need.”\r\n10 The idea is one of fellowship. Here the church must be about building relationships in friendship. Through pleasant culture the evangel becomes attractive and as relationships are veritable there should be people added, for the first while, in areas of greenness interest and then as firm followers of Christ.\r\nIn the linguistic circumstance of relationship building there should also be an aspect of accountability. It should be note that the ultimate goal of successful discipleship is to make people accountable to Christ first and each other as an springiness of the primary relationship with Christ. This however, must be link up to hygienic accountability in relationship. some may refer to this as creating healthy boundaries.\r\nAlthough, this may seem abstractedness to many, in its exposition it should become clear. Some may find it offensive to even suggest that disc iple makers should consider relative boundaries. However, this is important in two ways. These ways are easily seen as maintaining befitting article of faith and image proper Christian love.\r\nFirst, one must see that authoritative boundaries must be maintained. As Jonathan Leeman points out, that the church is rampant in its, â€Å"loss of doctrinal, bounds making thinking,”\r\n11 furthermore, that this loss is linked to allowing churches to, â€Å"veer toward number-counting or Spirit-chasing (or both)”.\r\n12 This has eventually led the church to see an inflow of people. Yet, also there is a lack of spiritual maturity or ability to regurgitate disciples. This must be seen in direct connection to the cultural phenomena of, â€Å"individualism, consumerism, and a reluctance to commit, and skepticism toward all forms of doctrine”\r\n13 The goal however, should be in relationships to tantrum the opposite of this mentality. The goal should center on accountability and self sacrifice, healthy boundaries and love from a biblical linguistic scene of community.\r\nFurthermore, it should be unders in additiond that in picturing proper, restorative love in community is essential. The culture to which disciples will be sent is one intoxicated by love. This is a problem, in that the predominant cultural experience of love is so very much implied upon the church and furthermore, Christ. It is expected that Christ is all judge rather than bear on about belief or accountability. Restorative ministry in a community context must be fleshed out in a context of Gospel transparency. The church shadowernot disciple sinners with out loving them enough to picture this molding in relationship. Hold true to doctrine and do not compromise for the sake of â€Å"love”.\r\nLastly, one must seek to operate a framework of discipleship that can be throw upd. The church in too many cases has tied itself to structures that cannot be reproduce d on an individual level. It is key to understand that, â€Å" imitation ensures that a movement will live past its founding stages.”\r\n14 This must be ac intimacyd in great esthesis. Jesus mum the need for generative discipleship and so should the modern church. The model of Jesus must be seen as the nearly successful model in that he understood and employ a strategy of reproduction centered on a small handful of original disciples. Robert Coleman notes this in his hand the Master Plan of Evangelism by stating the following: â€Å"His concern was not with programs to reach the multitudes but with men whom the multitudes would follow… men were to be His method of winning the land to God. The initial objective of Jesus’ programme was to enlist men who could bear consider to His life and carry on His work after He returned to the Father.”\r\nJesus understood the value of organic reproduction. The local church as well should seek to embody this. However, it seems this has not been the goal in lots of the historical efforts of discipleship.\r\nBehavioral Goals\r\nDiscipleship as unmannerly Viola states is, â€Å"a lifestyleâ€an veritable(a) journey with the Lord Jesus and His disciples.”\r\n15 in that locationfore, any unconscious process seeking to make disciples should desire to integrate fully a successful plan of political platform. This curriculum should fit in a clear-cut concept of behavioral goals. As Mitchell states, â€Å"Step number one in developing the curricular plan is establishing both institutional and individual goals and expectations.”16 This must be assessed if discipleship is to be accomplished.\r\nAn overarching goal statement should be established to watch the educator as they seek to lead and make disciples. The goal then of this curricular plan must be seen as follows: To make disciples capable of living on mission, in journey, and reproductive in nature. This goal statement should be seen at the shopping centre of successfully making disciples. However, the statement in itself is incapable of fleshing out the reality of this goal. at that place must be an expectation of face-to-face goals accompanying the discipleship goal statement.\r\nBehavioral goals should be built around the framework of this statement. These goals should follow as well the model seen in the core ministry values. man-to-mans in the discipleship structure should be further to integrate the following principles into their lives on a daily basis:\r\n secure\r\nCare\r\nBuild\r\nReproduce\r\n singulars should be encouraged to integrate these behaviors in their proclaim lives on a daily basis.\r\nThe voice communication of Scripture should point this out. One reads in Matthew 28:19 that the call is to, â€Å"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,”17 The point of â€Å"going” is better conveyed in the Greek, which reads as, â€Å"πορεÏοΠ¼ÃŽÂ±ÃŽÂ¹Ã¢â‚¬Â18This therefore is be as, â€Å"to lead over, carry over, transfer, to pursue the journey on which one has entered, to continue on one’s journey.”19 This must be seen as important in the behavioral goals of a discipleship effort. Individuals must be encouraged to integrate the four core values into a lifestyle of evangelism, rather than the more common structure of catapulting oneself into culture. Such an effort is often times defined by congregants in the form of confessional faith alone. The goal should be to integrate people into the journey ahead ever assessing the nature of their salvation. Salvation should be the goal yet; it should not be the point of the spear. Far too many have presented Christian community as transactive, whereas it should be seen as transformative in nature.\r\nThe above format however may be seen as drastically different than the model shown in the historical model of church. Individual disciple-followers should begin to acknowledge that the need is not to go â€Å"on mission” but to â€Å"do life” as mission. There should be a language percentage to this shift. An individual slogan therefore could be state simply as, â€Å"Keep settle and Disciple on”. The goal of much(prenominal) a slogan is two fold. The desire should be to create a common language as well as a framework for motivation in a blowable and familiar style. This must be understood in hunting lodge to fully integrate discipleship into ones life. Furthermore, there should be a visual component to this as well.\r\nThis visual can be seen in the following: .\r\nThe above visual should be seen as key in the consolidation of material into the teaching and educative principles concerned with behavioral objectives. The form can be utilized as a further tool to incorporate and engage the culture at large concerning the building of relationships. This must be seen as key in the implementation of the above described discipleship structure.\r\nTherefore, it should be assessed that the behavioral objectives of this discipleship strategy are to lead others to integrate the â€Å"engage, fretting, build, reproduce” strategy into their lives. Individual disciple-followers should be lead to, engage culture, attention for their communities, build relationship through that caring, and reproduce disciples from those relationships. These are the behavioral objectives of this strategy and are essential to its implementation.\r\nMeasureable Objectives\r\nMeasurable cores should also be seen as important to the accomplishing of precious discipleship structures. The question of what expectation is held by the leading of Fairway Church for the individual disciple-followers is important and should be well defined at the onset of the structure. Dietrich Bonheoffer stated in his classical work demeanor Together that as believers, â€Å"We must be ready to allow ourselves to be interrupt by God, God will be constantly crossing our paths and canceling our plans…”\r\n20 This reiterate should jock individual drawing cards as they seek to integrate mensural objectives into a successful framework for discipleship. Successful discipleship should create disciples willing to have their lives interrupted by Jesus.\r\nThe measurable outcome in close should be centered on the ability of individuals to live in such a way that discipleship is accomplished regardless as to the inconvenience to their personal lives. It should therefore, be celebrated that at the end of this discipleship course individuals should be integrated into community and motivated to form community in whatever context available to them. These measurable outcomes must be pose as central to the success of this plan of discipleship. each component must be seen more in depth as to understand the importance of each.\r\nFirst, one must see the importance of individuals being integrated into community. D arrin Patrick notes this in his book For the metropolis in a remarkable way. after(prenominal) noticing the large amount of non-believers in his congregation Patrick also noted that they ( leaders), â€Å"learned that what stood out to people was the context of challenging, biblical teaching in the context of a community of people who seemed to genuinely care for one another and spend time together.”\r\n21 This is for the purposes of this paper a successful picture of what it means to integrate people into valuable community. This integration however, must be operate toward further goals.\r\nNext, one must be capable of thinking sacrificially to accomplish the goals of engaging and reproducing. This must be seen in the context of community. Darrin Patrick exhibits this point by describing the establishment of the one-fifth campus of his church â€Å"The Journey”. Darrin notes that, â€Å"we launched our fifth campus, which started because of the shopping mall of a member of our church who have a thrift store and sought after a place for people who frequented there to go to church.”\r\n22 This must be seen as an embodiment of the measurable outcome of being motivated to form community. The individual disciple saw a need in community, as a result a new congregation was started and discipleship was carried on. In summation concerning the point of measurable outcomes lead should assess individuals in their ability to be part of community and their ability to form community. A successful disciple-follower will reproduce the discipleship model in different context foreign of the original community. This must be seen as the most important measurable objective of this discipleship structure. Base Path of Development (Measurable Steps)\r\nA base path of emergence should also be considered at this point in the training of a discipleship structure. These go should be assessed on both a corporate and an individual level. The larger context of the local church should improvement from the cash advance of discipleship efforts. This would be the measurable move assessed in the corporate context. However, it should also be seen that sound judgment on an individual level is required. Furthermore, the benefit to the church is not one of a superficial nature. The church itself should be seen as being reproducible. The goal is to build from smallest to largest. The smallest being individual disciples and the largest being the reproduction and continue proliferation of church planting movements. The symbiotic relationship that exists between the corporate and the individual nature of discipleship is seen by the statements of Dennis McCallum who disciples through a process of, â€Å"using one-on-one or one-on-two relationships to help people who have only tardily met Christ and need help nevertheless getting started at the most fundamental level.”\r\n23 However, this is also integral to the model of reproduction. The above quote points to the greater signification of multiplication. McCallum goes on to point that; â€Å"Each foot church in Xenos seeks to replicate itself within one to four years, depending on the guinea pig of group. To succeed, the home church must gain up a new aggroup of leaders and double the size of the group.”\r\n24 In short, it should be seen that a measurable outcome in the discipleship process of Fairway Church it the reproduction rate of both discipleship groups and church plants. As one evaluates the outcomes of developing disciple-followers there must be an tenseness placed on the corporate reproduction as well as the individual reproduction of disciples. As individuals are encouraged to â€Å"disciple on” there should be an understanding that an organic structure driven toward reproductive fellowships (i.e. church in whatever context) must be realized. Therefore, it must be noted that two measurable outcomes must be considered. First, are i ndividuals making disciples? Second, are these disciples forming relative fellowships built around the tenants of church? If these two outcomes are not seen lead should re-assess and provide individual disciples to continue by other means. This is key to the understanding of measureable outcomes in the context of the above discipleship structure. Furthermore, individuals should be encouraged to be experimental in their application of biblical teaching in the context of discipleship. One reads in the book the treillage and the Vine concerning this theme: â€Å"…just as some manner of framework is needed to help a vine grow, so Christian ministries also need some structure and support. It may not be much, but at the very least we need somewhere to meet, some Bibles to read from, and some basic structures of leadership within our group.”\r\n25 It should therefore, be embodied in the relationship between structure and organic growth that a positive leadership model gi ves guidance but not directives. The goal should be to keep first things first in the context of community application. There should be a solid vein of doctrinal agreement, leadership authority, and oversight. However, this does not mean that the communities are manipulated to look alike in any context. A vibrant community of faith should be one in which the practical application of doctrinal belief binds a community together rather than driving them apart.\r\n include Vision Statement\r\nFurthermore there should be an encompassing stack for any discipleship structure. The vision of a group must be well defined in order to keep the group as a whole motivated and driven toward a goal. A successful leader will continually measure the upgrade of the group. This leader should also be willing adjust the methods used as needed. Transformative leadership is leadership that must not be fixated with plans but capable of accomplishing goals through working(a)s and changing with the group. Vision, it seems should be viewed in a dualistic nature. Vision can be a catalyst or a nail in a coffin. Darrin Patrick notes this in his book Church Planter. He comments that a pastor without grace is a man characterized as, â€Å"a blind man take to a professorship of optics, philosophizing upon erupt and vision, discoursing upon and distinguishing to others the nice shades and delicate blendings of the prismatic colours, while he himself is absolutely in the dark!”\r\n26 It must be seen therefore, that vision can be very dangerous if given from the wrong prospect and through the wrong person. However, this should not lead one to think it unwise to have vision. Paul is noted as have thought strategically about vision. In short, it must be seen that vision does not trump strategic thinking and strategic thinking does not cancel out the value of vision. One reads concerning this that, â€Å"Paul had two checks in his spirit and an open vision, but it wasn’t until he concludedâ€put all these things together cognitivelyâ€that he knew where the Spirit was leading.”\r\n27 It should be therefore, that the leader of a discipleship effort should seek to accede an open vision with cognitive practical thought. Therefore, in considering the above exposition concerning the proposed discipleship structure of Fairway Church there should be a desire to define a vision built in the notion of Paul. This vision should be moldable as well as practical. At this point individuals should see the following vision statement as functional as well as doctrinal and spirit formed. Fairway Church discipleship exists to be the hands and feet of Jesus, to all those outside the walls of this church. We will live missionally, give sacrificially, and never kick encouraging others to join us on our way to Jesus.\r\nThis vision should be implemented to encourage individuals to successfully accomplish the goals of discipleship. In conjunction with leadership on a personal level it is hoped that people will be motivated toward replicating the discipleship structure on their own.\r\nIdentification and Description of Characteristics of the Target sort out\r\nThe target group of this discipleship model is two fold. These two groups are best and most easily identified as follows: Church Attenders and believers Un-churched and De-churched peoples\r\nEach of the above groups listed groups possess its own challenges as well as concerns. However, the success of this structure must be gauged in its ability to mesh the two together.\r\nFirst, one must integrate the existing resources of people and facilities toward accomplishing a greater understanding of evangelism in the context of discipleship. Ed Stetzer speaks of this by express the importance of a successful, â€Å"evangelistic strategy.\r\nâ€Å"28 he points out that such a strategy, â€Å"requires stages, helping people move from the ranks of the trifling and unreached to being active fo llowers of Jesus Christ.”\r\n29 Therefore, these move must start with those who already believe.\r\nFurthermore, this provides great comfort to the leader. Community in this seed group or core group will help not only to build new leaders but also give courage to the one in place. As the group develops and begins to implement the strategy of discipleship momentum will build and individuals will become bolder in their discipleship efforts.\r\nSecond, one must seek to broaden the base from which the discipleship efforts can begin to take shape. This stage would further develop the core values of engagement and relationship building. In a sense this stage would be the branching out stage. Individuals from the core would be encouraged to engage, care for, and build relationships with their community. In this process these individuals would seek to understand and acknowledge the individuals that can be identified with the un-churched and the de-churched.\r\nThis however, may seem a daunting task. However, when placed in context it should be seen that this task, although daunting, could be accomplished. One status seems to predominantly describe those that remain outside the church. The term of post-modern has taken on a prolific hatred in the contemporaneous American church. Yet, the hope remains that through engaging this culture there can be Gospel work accomplished.\r\nFirst, one should understand what a â€Å"post-modern” person is. Stanley Grenz notes that post-modernism is, â€Å"a questioning, and even rejection of the Enlightenment project and the foundational assumptions upon which it was built, namely, that knowledge is certain, objective, and inherently good.”\r\n30 In examining this exposition the church may react rather than respond. However, the church should ask itself whether this shift is necessarily a bad thing. Gabe Lyons notes that over all, â€Å"Americans are spiritual, but they have begun to seek spiritual experienc es outside the framework of traditional religions.”\r\n31 If this is the case than why should the church be frightful of reaching out to engage this cultural shift? In a sense should not such a culture find value in Christian community? Not to verbalise that Christian community should bend to guard but that a mentality defined by, â€Å"Think, hence I am”\r\n32 by its very tenant, accommodates one who acknowledges Christ. Therefore, the church should seek to engage this group in an effort to integrate them into greater biblical community. The question is well phrased when reading, â€Å"What if it’s (the post modern culture) actually a harnessable seethe that can refill the sails of our faith?”\r\n33 Action Plan\r\nAn action plan should further the discipleship effort of Fairway Church. This plan should be all encompassing as well as directed toward the context of each individual target group. The following treads should be taken in the goal to accompl ish successful discipleship in the congregation of Fairway Church. The activities should be seen the context of two activities of a Biblical context. These activities can be defined as net vomiting and wrench in the nets. First, one should see the first blackguards of the action plan as a net casting activity. These feelings include the cultivation of existing believers and the consumption (pulling in) of such to broaden the discipleship pool. In a sense one is casting nets into the germane(predicate) communities in order to find the workers for discipleship. These individuals are then brought into the discipleship conversation as a means to parlay such resources toward the greater community. In this step of action one seeks to find where God is already working and align themselves in an effort to have greater community impact toward making disciples of the un-churched and de-churched. Second, this step should be repeated on a broader scale.\r\nIt is in this second step of act ion that one should look for areas in which the church can truly make a difference. In this context Christians should be encouraged to build relationships by engaging the culture around them. The net casting in this step is defined by the individual disciples living on task and on journey in their community context. Continual long-term engagement should be encouraged at this point. Furthermore, this second step should be defined by the individual efforts of disciples to become more involved in the lives of those outside the church. Although, disciples should be encouraged to entreat disciples to Christian activities the main point is to form valuable organic relationships with those in the community. This step is hugely important to the continual development of discipleship efforts.\r\n mise en scene and Sequence Plan\r\nScope and sequence preparation should be seen as important as well. In such an assessment there should be nice to(predicate) evaluation given to the curriculum, calendar, and personnel needed to accomplish the goals of the discipleship efforts. It is in this portion of development that one may see the options as limitless. However, for the sake of being organic it should be noted that scope and sequence planning should be a minimalistic activity.\r\nCurriculum must be seen as standardized. Regardless, as to which group or facet of the discipleship structure, there should be a successful implementation of curriculum. It is the confidential information of this paper that there should be an emphasis placed on book studies. These studies however, should be developed from practical to theological and from larger group to smaller.\r\nAs individuals who already self identify as disciples arise in congregations they should immediately be integrated in a age bracket structure of discipleship training. The curriculum for such a group should be focused on training and empowering these individuals to cast nets for themselves and train future disciples . Each cohort should last no more than hexad weeks and should consist of a high level of accountability.\r\nThese groups should be no more than six-spot participants in number. This number should allow for adequate leadership and training. In this context there should be a practical book such as For the urban center by Darrin Patrick and Matt Carter. In conjunction to this there should also be a theologically significant book such as The surprising Offense of Gods revere by Jonathan Leeman.\r\nTo second these efforts there should also be practical training involved. Each disciple should also be engaged for up to three weeks after the initial cohort. Each disciple-follower would be encouraged in this time to begin a personal outreach to his or her local community. Creativity would be emphasized and applauded. The leader of the cohort would be there only in a collateral role.\r\nBudget and Communication Tools and Techniques\r\nA calculate plan should also be taken into considera tion. However, with an emphasis on an organic model and structure, the budget should also be very minimalistic. Within the confines of such a structure the main court would be book materials. Although individuals can be encouraged to buy the books there should be adequate understanding on the part of leadership. Books should be purchased in bulk and distributed at cost to leaders of individual groups.\r\nThis budgetary model should be seen as helpful in several ways. However, the lower the cost the more likely reproduction will be. Individual participants should be encouraged to take self-command of the discipleship model and its proliferation. Too many churches have launched into discipleship efforts with an emphasis on church morphologic centrality. This in turn has made the pictured model barren not easily reproduced. This mistake should be avoided at all cost.\r\nBibliography\r\nBevins, Winfield. Grow: Reproducing through Organic Discipleship. revival meeting , 2009.\r\nBonho effer, Dietrich. look Together: The Classic exploration of Christian Community. saucy York , NY: Harper collins , 1954.\r\nBonhoeffer, Detrich. The Cost of Discipleship . New York , NY : Thouchstone, 1959.\r\nChan, Francis. Multiply: Diciples make Disciples. conscientious objector Springs, CO: David C. Cook, 2012.\r\nColeman, Dr. Robert E. The Master Plan of Evangelism . Grand Rapids , MI: Revell Books , 1993.\r\nDescartes, Rene. Discourse on the Method and the Meditations . New York , NY: Cosimo, Inc, 2008\r\nESV Study Bible. Wheaton , IL: Crossway Bibles , 2008.\r\nGrenz, Stanley J., interview by Rogier Bos. Next Wave Interview (1999).\r\nLeeman, Jonathan. The Church and the strike Offense of God’s Love: Reintroducing the Doctrines of Church Membership and Discipline . Wheaton , IL: Crossway Books , 2010.\r\nLyons, Gabe. The NExt Christians: Seven ways you Can Live the Gospel and construct the World. Colorado Springs, Co: Multnomah Books , 2012.\r\nMarshall , Colin , and Tony Payne . The Trellis and the Vine: The Ministry Mind-Shift that Changes Everything. Kingsford : Matthias Media , 2009.\r\nMcCallum , Dennis , and Jessica Lowery . Organic Discipleship: Mentoring Others Into Spiritual Maturity and Leadership. New Paradigm Publishing , 2006.\r\nPatrick , Darrin, and Matt Carter . For the metropolis: Proclaiming and Living out the Gospel. Grand Rapids , Mi: Zondervan , 2012.\r\nPatrick, Darrin. Church Planter: The Man, The Message, The Mission. Wheaton , IL: Crossway, 2010.\r\nPatrick, Darrin, and Carter Matt. For the city: Proclaiming and Living Out the Gospel. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011.\r\nScrivener, Fredrick. Interlinear Greek New volition Bible (Kindle Edition). 2010.\r\nStetzer, Ed. Comeback Churches: How 300 Churches rancid Around and Yours Can Too. Nashville, TN: B & H Publishing Group, 2007.\r\nGospel [in] Life . Performed by Timothy Keller Redeemer City to City .\r\nViola, Frank. Finding Organic Church. Colorado Springs , CO: David C. Cook.\r\n'