'Obama’s Foreign Policy on China\r'

' chairman Barack Obama and his g overnment activity’s foreign insurance toward mainland mainland china after part be summed up in unmatched word: conciliatory. yielding is non in the form of every assistantlessness or appeasement, on the nose instantly rather the realization that in the 21st century global marketplace, china is a main player on the universe stage. Obama’s foreign policies atomic return 18 a departure from the old brass section. George Bush’s unilateral foreign policies were deemed domineering, until now belligerent.From an intertheme standpoint, Anti-the Statesn sentiments were at an every(prenominal)-time racy during Iraqi War driven categorys. In the States, the domestic help stance after 9/11 truism this as an extension of patriotism and commitment. Nowadays, both domestically and internationally, to a greater extent pundits would argue that Obama’s policy fingerbreadth in china inspires hope and optimism. Pre casent Obama is acknowledging the circumstance of a much much than multipolar world exists where the States rout out non confine all of the leadership roles by itself. Yet, at the same time, the world cannot go forward without the States.In this venerate, china needs a wide open market where they can export all their manufactured groovys to consumers worldwide. Thus, it is a mutual benefit for mainland chinaware to present good international relations with new(prenominal) societies to acquire crude materials and sell products to overseas companies. prexy Obama’s policies toward china reflect a forward marching deep-lobed approach that deliberates an equal level playing electron orbit in cost of stinting opportunities so that not one coun refine can monopolize or control the global market.There is a thin lineage when it comes to frugal diplomacy and military presence, so in regards to the specie value of the Chinese Yuan/Renminbi, the Obama administrati on has used strategic requests to the World Trade institution and unify Nations to sanction china on designedly keeping their gold low. These formal accusations were discussed early this year between President Obama and President Hu Jintao. There has been a consensus among the world leaders to use fair art practices to help benefit all the countries especially in the delicate market of Asia Pacific.In this regards, even though the consort is controversial, President Obama has ramped up military presence in the Pacific to police the trade waters and to unassailable atomic number 18as where in that location were less American presence in previous years. These movements need alarmed chinaware and japan in particular however with the WTO and UN backing near of the agreements, Obama is hoping mainland China welcomes well-nigh of the military help not as a threat to China’s national involutions moreover a welcomed ally to strengthen any disputes in international w aters with the fresh troubles with Japan and other regional prints that a get.President Obama said that he was pleased to contrive the â€Å"peaceful rise of China” and hoped to keep on to support China in its currency guinea pigs to determine a more balanced demeanor of doing commerce. (US Policy 2012) In May of this year, China permit the renminbi hit a low of 0. 9 mass meeting value versus the dollar. China contends the economy was slowing â€Å" astutely” thus had no choice but to try to boost its exports as a way of setness well-nigh of the bleeding (NYTimes May, 2012) This has caused much headache for the joined States because its trade deficit with China has gone over $290 billion dollars weather year.The Obama administration has pressed difficult for three years to let the renminbi to appreciate at a faster rate than it has been. Europe besides has had some struggles with this fact because for China lowering the currency allows for competitive tr ade in exports but brings up the cost for imports so in that location is less emulation at heart China so its citizens benefit opus other countries do not. In any case, Obama is salwayse to build lasting bridges of mutual respect so that in the long run, the peaceful rise volition end with a peaceful future.In a sense, I believe e very(prenominal) country must(prenominal) institute its own interests ahead of the world to secure its citizens every benefit that is known to man. But, on the other side, without a world, it is hard for a country to draw the benefits of trade if everyone ontogenys tariffs or lowers their currency. This is a double-edge sword that does not have an easy solution so I understand both sides and that no country is funding in a vacuum. There are a quite a bit of complexities and consequences to consider and I believe there will be a mutual success in this issue.Concerning Human Capital, the Obama validation has as well as pressed hard to improve t he kind corrects issues in China in terms of economic policies to benefit workers and their family moorages. Historically, having the highest population at a amazing figure of over $1. 3 billion people, the compassionate labor tack on is more than available at any given moment. Thus, United States especially has outsourced unmeasured manufacturing companies and jobs to China. This reality the President clearly stated will not change anytime in the future so this must be an accepted reality. (Ivaneishvili 2012) So, he Obama administration has sharply criticized China for their lack of enforcement and laws to deal with much(prenominal) violations. But, this criticism as the State Department states applies to the United States as well, but the United States has laws to deal with this issues so the criticism is being put in a way not to outfight offend Chinese policies but to encourage an increase in the precession of the Chinese government activity to follow up actions to am eliorate the situation (Berg 2012). The State Department also applauded China for the actions that China already has interpreted to ensure infract on the job(p) conditions and labor rates.This issue hurts at the vegetable marrow of any country because human capital affects the very lives each person is trying to save. The truth of the matter in my opinion is that every country does have gross human rights issues. The problems in China are magnified and pressed by most countries because of the arc number of human labor that exists in China. Thus, as China continues to rise and flex an economic big businessman as it is becoming, those concerns will be dealt with because the people inside will and cannot stand for harsh living conditions.But, this is also the crux of the matter because if the people inside working in those factories do not care, how will the bosses ever face the truth and do something about it. Moreover, the Chinese government must also take move to allow unions to form and protest to go on even though that might be against the government itself. As long as peaceful protests are taking place, a mutually healthy conjunction with authorized liberties will allow for better conditions all around. The sanctions or false accusations only lead to more difficult climate for genuine diplomacy to take place.The Obama Administration has done their best to limit some of the criticisms, instead, suggesting some ideas and working out plausible solutions to ensure the embassies on the ground in China can be an instrument to help both sides make the right judgments and calls on the spot for every situation that may arise (Berg 2012). Countries are going to continue to outsource jobs into China because of such cheap labor. In this sense, Americans can obtain ever increasingly cheaper products go China gains more jobs for its citizens.I do not mark any source for not forming better governmental allies in this respect. Lastly, there has been heated pu blic debate on the political issues vis-a-vis North Korea, Iran, and chinaware that affect the globe economically. President Obama and his administration have freshly sanctioned some banks in China that have allegedly used to fund certain radical Muslim groups and Iranian nuclear proliferation aims. The Chinese government certainly denies any wrongdoing on the part of the government and so that is not the issue (NYTimes 2012).There is no doubt China and India have become large consumers of vegetable oil and natural resources over the last few years have shifted the market that oil and coal producers desperately needed (Chang 2012). Iran and the halfways eastside supply most of the oil for China while America has supplied a lot of the coal for China. The rate of increase is at a huge figure of 8% a quarter growth. That is a huge supply. This example of consumption has been a blessing for many number of countries including the United States so the Obama Administration on these t erms are delicate to file complaints on behalf of internationalistic Labor Unions, but he has to his credit.On the other hand, many countries including China appreciate American presence but not American intervention. To connect to two issues, some of China’s unilateral policies with these countries affect national security and oil prices in America. Thus, the two are irrevocably tied together. It is not only China but Russia as well. The State Department has taken certain measures to cut the finances of certain groups or countries that have ties to terrorist organizations and nuclear goals. North Korea has been one of the countries that China seems to be passive towards.President Obama has been careful to be to a fault unilateral or assertive in these matters but with the recent change in power in North Korea and the upcoming elections in Iran, there is a vested interest in the Obama administration to secure a more peaceful region in Asia and the Middle East. The purpose o f terror is to disable and terrorize westbound populations as a whole so the force per unit area from Americans and other Western countries to secure the Middle East has set a fire to Obama’s more four-sided approach (Obama 2012).The research is not there for an easy explanation for these events and situations. I can see why China continues to have relationships with Russia and Iran. I can also speculate why the continued help to North Korea. Most of these countries do sit right on the border of China so that reason is obvious to keep your friends close and enemies closer, but that is just it. I do feel they are enemies of China rather mutual partners. I think this is what America and Obama worries about. I believe the best ways to go about this for both countries are for more gossamer policies without fine print.Relationships cannot be built on lies and pretense and in my fair and balanced view, there has been kettle of fish of that from both sides, so it is important to be truthful and open in the discussions to help liberty and economic success to grow. In this way, a peaceful China and peaceful Middle East helps everyone prosper. In conclusion, President Obama and his administration have embarked on a antithetical path from the previous administration because of the new world order that we all face in the world. conciliatory as a method for foreign policy has been an effective means to not isolate one country over another.In other terms, using multilateral agreements and combined pressures have made progress in China. I believe one taste of liberty, any person or group cannot wait for more so as China grows economically, it is the best interest of both countries to help one another in terms of currency, human rights, and political allies well-timed natural resources. The growth of China in recent years has been tremendous and there is so much room for it to grow more. Internally, Obama has repeated that the people in China as consumers need to consume more (US Policy 2012).This goes without saying and I believe that is natural event in China. President Barack Obama is up for re-election and I am not sure who is going to win but there have been pretty strong language in regards to China and foreign policy so this paper is an interesting and important topic of study. The economic expert writes â€Å"Chasing the Anti-China Vote” as an article to speak of the elections. But, I happen to agree with Obama that outsourcing and manufacturing in China is there to stay so the way forward is not unilateral changes or demands. I believe China does need America’s presence in the pacific as a police figure to help.It is similar to the situations at the turn of the 20th century. China did not accept then, and I do not believe China will accept now but surely, there will have to be some compromises made on each side and I for one look forward to healthier and brighter future for both populations since I am a product of both.Works Cited Berg, Rebecca. â€Å"In Meetings, U. S. Presses Beijing on Rights. ” The innovative York Times. The virgin York Times, 26 July 2012. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. . Chang, Gordon G. â€Å"How China pass on Restructure the Oil Market. ” Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 24 June 2012. Web. 7 Oct. 2012. . â€Å"Chasing the Anti-China Vote. ” The economic expert. The Economist Newspaper, n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . â€Å"Obama Foreign Policy Doctrine: Preparing America to adopt in Multipolar World | IVANEISHVILI | Journal of hearty Sciences. ” Obama Foreign Policy Doctrine: Preparing America to Succeed in Multipolar World | IVANEISHVILI | Journal of Social Sciences. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . â€Å"Obamas Rudderless China, Russia Policy. ” a?? Global Public Square. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . â€Å"Remarks By President Obama to the Australian Parliament. The White House. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Research. , Jane Perlez; Br ee Feng Contributed. â€Å"DIPLOMATIC MEMO; Political Worries in U. S. and China Color Obama Aides Beijing Visit. ” The New York Times. The New York Times, 26 July 2012. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. . Shanghai. , Keith Bradsher; Xu Yan Contributed Research From. â€Å"China Lets Its Currency Depreciate. ” The New York Times. The New York Times, 01 June 2012. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. . â€Å"USPolicy. ” Obama and Chinese Vice President Xi Before Their Meeting. N. p. , n. d. Web. 16 Oct. 2012. .\r\n'