'Ethical\r'

'The problem This paper discusses the legal and h integrityst implications in conjunction with performing procedure on modify people for complaisant reasons. Ethical Katie is immaturity and she has the counterbalance like opposite non-disabled girls to live with her remains in manners and she has the same choice to lapse take in to her accept baby. According to the Family Court in Australia and Family Law Act 1975, no person at a lower place 18 should have hysterectomy unless the procedures ar necessary to anticipate serious physical and psychological damage and to moreover smell (Skene, 2008, p. 38). Medical This surgery is non medic all toldy necessary and it is permanent, persistent, traumatic and painful that it results in the eternal loss of reproductive capacity. The medical complications after surgery will affect the person health. Social in that location atomic number 18 lacks of access to health services and recourses, social and educational support for her and her family. Katie is lack of the basic homosexual rights, freedoms to work, freedoms to get education and move freely astir(predicate) society. Legal\r\nThe parents could not consent and the doctor does not have the right to remove the womb of Katie as non-therapeutic surgery requires court approval. This is not just a medical last for the doctor, moreover the kid’s trounce interest and the consequences of wrong decision creation made. The facts It is estimated in Australia that a child is born with noetic palsy every 15 hours. There is no pre-birth test and no kn testify cure for cerebral palsy (Levitt, 2010, p. 33). Cerebral palsy is a abiding physical condition that affects movement.\r\nIt effects can be just a weakness from one hap ranging to almost complete lack of movement (Miller & Browne, 2005, p. 51). batch with cerebral palsy may have seizures and other impairments that affect their speech, vision, hearing or intellect. Spastic, Dyskinetic and Ataxic are the three main types of cerebral palsy. A cerebral palsy result from the neurological damage to the child’s developing brain (Miller et al. , 2005, p. 51). There is greater risk in babies born with low birth weight and preterm. Cerebral palsy can be diagnosed through test reflexes, check for hand preference, CT scan, MRI and Ultrasonography.\r\nThe treatment are physical therapy which consists work to keep limbs from weakening, speech therapy can help ascertain lost control over facial and pharynx muscles and gaining the ability to communicate effectively, medication help hold on certain effects of cerebral palsy such(prenominal) as seizures and surgery which is performed to cut some of the nervousness affected by spasms and minimize muscle contr executions (Miller et al. , 2005, p. 52). intravenous feeding principles Autonomy Autonomy is described as the right to self-determination, the ability to control what happens to us and how we behave (Staunton & #038; Chiarella, 2003, p. 8). This is a significant ethical principle which allows respect for individuals opinion, action and their personal space. Katie is believed to understand little of what is said to her but she has no sense of what is happened to her body. Although, she has the right to make her own decision but she could not give binding consent.. Non-maleficence The principle of ‘above all, do no wrong’ ( Pera & Tonder, 2005, p. 34). A strong principle in health care and it forms the basis of nurses’ duty of care.\r\nThis procedure affects the eudaemonia and health of Katie as it is seriously invasive her personal integrity and mankind dignity. Health care professionals should subdue emotional, spiritual, moral and physical harm to Katie’s dignity (Pera et al. , 2005, p. 34). Beneficence The principle of ‘above all, do considerably’ (Staunton & Chiarella, 2003, p. 29). It includes the principle of cost benefit analys is and paternalism. In health care, this principle range from determining the take and type of hospital beds in a abandoned geographic area to the validation of research involving valet subjects (Pera & Tonder, 2005, p. 4). In Katie typeface, she deserve better quality of life that she won’t suffer from menstrual pain, discomfort, sensory system swings, behavior changes and complication of adulthood. More information astir(predicate) women’s health nowadays and more alternatives options should be given to her parents so that Katie could receives the best and suitable treatment. legal expert The principle of justice is the unifying principle in health and nursing ethics. It comprises the justice as virtue and justice of an equal allocation of burdens and benefits (Staunton et al. , 2003, p. 30). Ethical conflicts\r\nThis case raises fundamental ethical issue about the steering the society treats disabled people and the respect for the human rights and repr oductive rights of disabled people. There are a few ethical conflicts arise in Katie case. The conflicts are: is the operation in the best interest of the child, is in that location any risk of reservation decision falsely and is it ethically allows having hysterectomy on disabled people infra 18 and without their consent. Menstruation is always regarded negative for parents with disabled kids as it is uncomfortable, unclean and devastating.\r\nTherefore, most parents wanted hysterectomy on their disabled kids before their menstruation as they thought their disabled kids would not be able to trade and deal with menstruation. But, it is not known that whether hysterectomy is in the best interest of the child as no one could predicts about the future problems to be encountered with menstruation. This is not plumb for the disabled people as they have the rights to welcome changes of their body and have their body in tact through their life span (Fellowes, 2000).\r\nSterilization is a serious invasion the person honor and arrogance as their womanhood is being stolen. In 1994, Brennan J, the head word Justice of the High Court of Australia believed that mentally or physical disabled people should enjoy a full decent life, in condition which operate dignity, promote self-reliance and participate in the familiarity (Fellowes, 2000). There is a significant risk of making the wrong decision to what are the best interests of a child who cannot consent and the consequences of a wrong decision are grave as this procedure is irreversible and invasive.\r\nCincinnati Adolescent Clinic had carried out an interviewed in 1983, 69 parents were interviewed regarding sterilisation of their disabled daughters. Almost 80 percents parents had thought of sterilization and their common reason was to protect their daughters from pregnancy (Strahan, 1991). plurality with disabilities have the equal human rights as all members of the community (Disability Discrimination Act 1 992). Katie has the rights to make her own decision and acknowledge what is happened to her body and health\r\n'