Wednesday, April 3, 2019
Strengths and Limitations to Research Design and Methods
Strengths and Limitations to Research devise and MethodsCarly ReidAbstract pass judgment the strengths and limitations of each of the look figures presented in Weeks 2 and 3.Recommend a duodecimal jut out for your research plan. Include a rationale for why that heading would be most appropriate.For the designs that you did not choose, state why each mavin is not appropriate for your research questions, hypotheses, and variable stars.Support your work with references to the literature.data-based Design StrengthsExperimental designs sets the precedence for being the first timeworn prototypes for investigators. Researchers can make up ones mind in unfree variables and dispose of superfluous variables more so than other research design methods. With the ability to manipulate contact to in symbiotic variables experimental design allows a researcher to conclude causal relationships within the design. With the ability to lookout station cause and effect and the influence of the i ndependent variable on the dependent one. (Fort-Nachmias Nachmias, 2008) Since the conditions argon guaranteeled in experimental design this permits duplication that allows the researcher to evidence their results. New research is contingent upon experimental design methods because when this research experiments are doubled it allows other researchers to have confidence in a bailiwicks results. (Fort-Nachmias Nachmias, 2008)Experimental Design LimitationsExperimental design strives to remove or governs foreign variables yet this whitethorn not always be probable. Especially when the study has to do with real world situations since its next to impossible to replicate a natural environment this weakens external validity. (Levy, Ellis, Cohen, 2011) When dealing with the plectron ferment it may not be random which is necessary to control variables. Samples sizes may not me indigenous of a wider population making results too frequent to the population of interest. (Fort-Nachm ias Nachmias, 2008) This methodology can prove to be unethical or impossible to apply arbitrary treatments to patients and or control populations.Quasi-Experimental Design StrengthsA quasi-experimental designed studies lets researchers stress behavior in ordinary situations that arent normally pliable to experimental designs. The external validity is increased when using natural samples. (Fort-Nachmias Nachmias, 2008) In this weeks assignments Marques and Lima (2011) studied the effects of alive in industrial neighborhoods. Marques and Lima (2011) took a look at how upkeep in an industrial neighborhood can mentally effect its inhabitants.Since the researchers didnt use random assignments to compare groups this would be considered a quasi-experimental design. Marques and Lima were ineffective to control where those they were studying lived. Researchers who create comparison groups through a non-random methods study groups are using quasi-experimental design. Quasi-experimenta l design is a substitute for experimental design since experimental design uses random assignment to groups. For instance a researcher may inquire of the differences of participants in the groups due to gender, marital term, age, or reading level. In this particular article the difference was years of residing in a particular town. There was no other significant difference in the four samples. (Marques Lima, 2011)Quasi-Experimental Design LimitationsSince quasi-experimental design doesnt use random selection to allocate assignments to participants to comparison groups, the person conducting the research must be aware of how the non-random selection process might affect the study results. (Shannon, Goldenhar, Hale, 2001) When determining the differences surrounded by groups with factors like age, socio-economic status, gender, marital status, education level or other differences a researcher might want to know if there are built-in differences. As a researcher it is definitiv e to take into account these differences since they could perchance affect participant responses to the support group to which they are linked. (Shannon et al., 2001) It is also important to note that these differences must be accounted for and detailed for statistical analysis. (Shannon et al., 2001).Unchosen Research DesignsExperimental DesignQuasi-experimental versus experimental differs in that experimental always uses a control group to which research participants are randomly assigned, given treatments executed by the researcher, and followed by an assessment of the effects of treatment. (Levy, Ellis, Cohen, 2011) Experimental designs measure the connection in the midst of the independent and dependent variables of which researchers have complete control of independent variables effects on the dependent variables. (Fort-Nachmias Nachmias, 2008)Cross-Sectional Design cross-sectional deigns surveillances and uses random sampling of research participants and tend to be connec ted to brush up research. (Fort-Nachmias Nachmias, 2008) Information is recorded from the mickle without manipulation of variables or exposure of groups to a single treatment. Cross-sectional research designs can give researchers a nominated tool to examine many individualities concurrently like age, gender socio-economic status between the sibyllic group that is participating in a researched drill and the group that isnt. This design is descriptive rather than causal. Experimental design manipulates variables conflicting cross-sectional designed research.My Research Design for Quantitative StudyThe detail of my study is to define the individualities of a sample of young primary care providers of Alzheimers and monomania patients between the ages of 28 and 40 to conclude the effects of self-consciousness and familial support on stress management. The sample will be do up of caregivers responses to a flyer announcement for participants displayed at a topical anesthetic A dult Daycare center. Contingent on the number of responses, all, or an unsystematically selected number of participants will be carefully chosen.This population was chosen because of the supposed impact of stress on younger Alzheimers/Dementia caregivers. The survey design will be a self-administered questionnaire for the data collection in this study. The partiality for survey design is steered by the necessity to gather caregiver responses concerning the personal experiences of these younger caregivers in demanding circumstances with concern to their use of self-conceit and having familial support. The survey tool used was designed specifically for this research. The dependent variable in both hypotheses is the management of stress. The independent variables are self-esteem and familial support.The survey content is designed to identify to what extent participants engage their family networks. The survey will also ascertain how their self-esteem is effected in stressful situatio ns as a caregiver. The data will be examine and interpreted reporting the results of the returned surveys as well as the amount of the non-returned surveys. A wave analysis will be utilized where we will examine returns on select items week by week to determine if add up responses change from beginning to the end of the process. (Creswell, 2009 pg. 152). Descriptive analysis will be provided for the independent and dependent variables in the study and will identify the means, standard deviations, and range of scores for these variables. (Creswell, 2009 pg. 152) An analysis of variance will be apply to make contrasts between the independent variables. (Creswell, 2009 pg. 152)ReferencesBurger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1-11. doi10.1037/a0010932.Creswell, J. (2009). Research design Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications.Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmi as, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences (7th ed.). New York Worth.Levy, Y., Ellis, T. J., Cohen, E. (2011). A taper for Novice Researchers on Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies in Information Systems Research. Interdisciplinary diary Of Information, Knowledge Management, 6151-161.Marques, S., Lima, M. L. (2011). Living in grey areas Industrial activity and psychological health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 314-322. doi10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.12.002Shannon, H. S., Goldenhar, L. M., Hale, A. R. (2001). Chapter 4 Quasi-experimental and experimental designs More justly evaluation designs. In L. S. Robson (Author), Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing work injuries How to show whether a safety intervention really works. (pp. 29-42). Cincinnati NIOSH.Trochim, W. M. (2006). Quasi-experimental design. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Retrieved December 21, 2013, from http//www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/quasiexp. php
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment