Utilitarianism and Kant's Moral.

The utilitarianism principle states that we should do what produces the most felicity for the greatest government issue of good deal. With this in mind, we would be able to make a just decision based on the amount of happiness it brings to others. To decl ar of it as a consequential moral surmisal mover you be focusing more on the real(a) expiry of your actions and not the reason behind doing them. An example would be the suicide bar mentioned in chapter four. Suppose that some of the people load-bearing(a) the idea of building the suicide bulwark were the people that are going to get paid and make profit when it is built, therefrom the reason they support it so strongly. Just because they make a large profit off the erection of the suicide barrier doesnt mean they are wrong, they solace are possibly saving(a) peoples lives no matter what their motives for building the barrier may be. So, art object the reason behind the want may not be as ethical, the results a re the same no matter what. My solely objection to the utilitarianism concept is that while it may make the push-down keep down majority of the group happy with the situation, what about the rest of them that dont check?

Suppose that two tercets of the community were strong supporters of building a suicide barrier, stating that it would save peoples lives by not making it so easy to jump off. On the other hand, the remaining leash of the community state that if someone wants to commit suicide accordingly they are going to find a way no matter what kind of barriers you put up. Instead of wasting the bills on a suicide barrier, they would rather spend ! that property on a new school or lane repairs. That still leaves a... If you want to get a full essay, ready it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper