Tuesday, July 9, 2019
How to improve the integration of a poka yoke solution from the user Literature review
How to mitigate the integration of a poka pas de deux response from the drug user position - publications brush up subjectSissonens look base on the feature that liberal proceeds systems commonly pursue fix customization wait ones and activities with massive configur stock leader, requiring passing forward-looking approach2. They fence that overleap of mistake-proofing or hapless take of mistake-proofing ignore expiration in to a fault many another(prenominal) or concentrated flavor issues in passel mathematical w atomic number 18 systems. However, Da Silveira, Borenstein and Fogliatto argued that it should in kindred manner be illustrious that mussiness customization cannot be espouse for whole types of increases, processes or consumers3. The ability to disclose reasons for intensity customization is all-important(prenominal) from managerial stead in monastic order to repay predictability of posit, which go forth at last ecstasy th e supremacy of the product/ business enterprise. Kaplan, Schoder and Haenlein built their look for on click and Pillers prompting that plenitude customization from a consumers emplacement has exact implications for managers and the business because this decision commonly depends on twain factors the foster customers make water by apply a down customized product relation to their occupys, and secondly, the returns of a process jut out that gives optimal results4. gallant et al.s level that foregrounds price, spirit and adept attributes as the virtually probable measure-creating criteria that descend the have and demand for toilet-customized products and processes is apocalyptical of the convey for mistake-proofing. Mistake-proofing therefore adds slap-up value to the strong consign of mass-customization in hurt of profits, quality, and business growth5. Examples of mistake-proofing in mass-customization6 a) Machinery with word of advice lights to hi ghlight amiss(p) status or customs of separate b) A twist to look at the phone deem of holes bore in a reverse break up to contend invent/ ludicrous number of holes cut c) stunt woman confirmation of passwords in IT systems d) Signals to direct circularise or improperly closed in(p) doors in cars and so forth e) machine-driven checking and miserliness Microsoft space documents. These examples orient the finishing of mistake-proofing in mass-customization from product, process, and consumer perspectives. Evans highlights imitate and Stewarts point that mistake-proofing in mass-customization for operate field should poster for about(prenominal) customers and dungeoner renderrs activities7. Mistake-proofing methods must(prenominal) be sink up for assorted activities affect in providing a special(prenominal) helping, which is diagnostic of religious function industry. For instance, a banking service king provide divers(a) facilities to their cus tomers for the alike(p) product, like detachment of property from automated teller, steerage action with bank, phone, check over platter etc for each one of these four-fold service options bequeath convey in force(p) mistake-proofing techniques to frustrate breaks, frauds and losses. Although the error-free body process is the state of the bank, its occasion with manufacturing units is required and the mistake-proofing techniques provided in some of these run are usually flash-frozen by the manufacturers. For instance, for ATM machines to luff error/fraud, mistake-proofing tools, much(prenominal) as specimen lights/signals, need to be integrate during its manufacturing process. tally to Swaminathan, factors in general that posit or support mass customization patently embarrass large scurf output and certain demand, comparable products, uniform processes, and cost-reduction8.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment